Armed Forces: Coroners' Inquests

Lord McNally: My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Jonathan Djanogly) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	My honourable friend the Minister for the Armed Forces and I wish to make our quarterly statement to the House with details of the inquests of service personnel who have died overseas. We maintain the highest possible regard for all of our service personnel who are or have been involved in the military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Our deepest sympathies, of course, lie with the families of those personnel who have made the ultimate sacrifice. We record with great sadness that since our last Statement, on 22 July, a further 19 service men and women have lost their lives.
	Today we are announcing the current status of inquests conducted by the Wiltshire and Swindon and other coroners. This Statement gives the position at 21 October.
	I have placed tables in the Libraries of the Houses which outline the status of all cases and the date of death in each case. Copies are also available in the Vote Office and the Printed Paper Office. These tables include information about cases where a board of inquiry or a service inquiry has been held. We are encouraged to see that the average period of time from the date of death to the inquest continues to reduce, which is of considerable benefit primarily to the bereaved families, but also to other parties to the inquests. The average age of inquests into operational deaths which are yet unlisted is eight months.
	Current status of inquests
	Since the last Statement 36 inquests have been held into the deaths of service personnel on operations in Iraq or Afghanistan. This makes a total of 361 inquests held into deaths of service personnel on operations in Iraq and Afghanistan since June 2006, when additional resources were first provided to the Oxfordshire coroner.
	Since operations commenced in 2001 there have been a total of 415 inquests into the deaths of service personnel who have lost their lives in Iraq and Afghanistan, including 11 service personnel who died in the UK of their injuries. In two further cases, no formal inquest was held, but the deaths were taken into consideration during inquest proceedings for those who died in the same incident.
	We remain deeply grateful for the efforts of all of the coroners who are involved in conducting these inquests. We also wish to reiterate that our departments are committed to working together, and to continuing the Government's support for these coroners.
	Open inquests
	Fatalities in Iraq and Afghanistan
	There are no outstanding inquests into deaths prior to 1 April 2007, since when fatalities have been repatriated via RAF Lyneham in Wiltshire. Since October 2007 additional resources have been provided to ensure that a backlog of inquests does not build up in the Wiltshire and Swindon coroner's district. The coroner, David Ridley, transfers inquests for service personnel to a coroner closer to the bereaved family, wherever possible.
	At present there are 102 open inquests to be concluded into the deaths of service personnel who died in Iraq and Afghanistan (59 involving deaths in the past six months). Of these, Mr Ridley has retained 33 inquests, whilst 58 inquests are being conducted by coroners closer to the next of kin. At 21 October one recent fatality awaited repatriation and inquest opening. Hearing dates have been set in 10 cases.
	Inquests into the deaths of service personnel who returned home injured
	There remain 11 inquests to be held of service personnel who returned home injured and subsequently died of their injuries. These will be listed for hearing when the continuing investigations are completed.
	We shall continue to keep the House informed about progress with the remaining inquests.

Correction to Lords Oral Answer

Lord Taylor of Holbeach: The Answer I provided to a supplementary question asked by Lord Kennedy of Southwark on the Appointments Commission during the Statement on 14 October (Official Report, col. 633) was inaccurate.
	The Appointments Commission is indeed to be abolished, and accountability for remaining public appointments will rest with Ministers. To ensure fairness in future appointments there is a firmly established role for the Commissioner for Public Appointments, with a clear code of conduct for the operation of ministerial public appointments.
	All departments are required to ensure that the appointment process is open and transparent and that appointments are made on merit. Where and how Ministers can or cannot be involved is very clearly set out in the code. Government departments have in the past managed this arrangement successfully, and will continue to do so in the future.

Defence Support Group

Lord Astor of Hever: My honourable friend the Minister for Defence Equipment, Support and Technology (Peter Luff) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	I am announcing today that the Ministry of Defence (MoD) is beginning formal consultation with the various representative trades unions of the Defence Support Group (DSG) on a proposed programme of staff reductions designed to maintain the organisation's profitable trading position and the valuable support it provides to defence.
	Despite major cost savings and efficiencies delivered by DSG since its formation on 1 April 2008, the business is faced with declining order books. It must therefore begin a major structural reform to realign its capacity and capability with defence customers' reducing demand. Based on current workload plans, this will result in a reduction in staff levels by up to 600 by April 2013 around 17.5 per cent of the DSG workforce. However, it is not envisaged that these reductions will result in site closures.
	Implementation of the staff reductions must start as soon as possible to remove overcapacity and ensure the trading fund remains profitable and viable. The MoD does not expect the recent strategic defence and security review (SDSR) announcement to negate the need for staff reductions or the imperative for commencing consultation now. Should SDSR lead to a requirement for further staff reductions at DSG then this will be subject to a separate consultation process in due course.
	Both MoD and DSG will do all that they can to minimise the effect to employees by delivering these staff reductions through voluntary means but naturally we cannot rule out potential release by compulsory means.
	In parallel, the trades unions, MoD and DSG will work with other government departments and agencies to explore future job opportunities for DSG employees affected by these manpower reductions. Working closely with external training providers and agencies such as Jobcentre Plus and other advisory organisations, DSG will explore alternative training and job opportunities for any employees wanting to retrain for an alternative career.
	In conclusion, I pay tribute to the outstanding service DSG personnel provide and the pivotal role they play in supporting the UK Armed Forces with the vital equipment they need on critical operations both at home and overseas.

EU: Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council

Lord Freud: My honourable friend the Minister of State for Employment (Chris Grayling) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	The Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council was held on 21 October 2010 in Luxembourg. Andy Lebrecht, UK Deputy Permanent Representative to the EU, represented the United Kingdom.
	The main item of the agenda was a policy debate on the employment and social inclusion aspects of Europe 2020, the new European agenda for the next 10 years. The presidency set out the mechanics of the new EU2020 governance arrangements stating that the joint employment report should be the main vehicle for submitting messages to the spring European Council and the subsequent country-specific recommendations to the summer European Council. The UK supported the proposed governance arrangements, noting that the joint employment report should focus on robust evidence of what works. The UK outlined the key features of the spending review in this area-welfare reform and helping people into work. The UK would now consider the issue of bottlenecks and reform priorities in the EU context.
	The Social Protection Committee opinion on social protection and social inclusion in the Europe 2020 strategy was adopted. The presidency invited member states to comment on their own input to the social dimension of Europe 2020, particularly through national poverty targets and the national reform programmes. The Commission stressed that real consideration of the social dimension of Europe 2020 was essential if the strategy were to be a success, and urged member states to finalise their national targets. The UK explained that an approach to the national target had not yet been confirmed. The UK showed support for effective use of the open method of co-ordination and stressed that excessive new reporting burdens should be avoided.
	The council adopted the employment guidelines. The UK abstained in order to respect the UK parliamentary scrutiny position.
	The Commission presented its recent initiative, Youth on the Move. This proposes to encourage worker mobility, improve education quality, training systems and support to young job seekers and entrepreneurs. The Commission also set out its intention for a new Roma communication next April. This would set out a framework for national Roma integration, in which member states would be encouraged to develop strategies to deal with their Roma populations. On the pensions Green Paper, the Commission stressed that the issue of demographic change would remain to be tackled even after the economic crisis had passed and that pension reform would consequently need to remain high on the agenda.
	The presidency reported on conferences on poverty, child poverty, pensions and green jobs and also informed delegates about preparations for the next tripartite social summit.

EU: Environment Council

Lord Henley: My right honourable friend the Secretary of State (Caroline Spelman) has today made the following Statement.
	I represented the United Kingdom at the Environment Council on 14 October in Luxembourg, together with my honourable friend the Minister of State at the Department of Energy and Climate Change (Gregory Barker).
	The council agreed conclusions on the EU's negotiating position for the Nagoya conference on biodiversity. In support of the conclusions, I underlined the need for a united EU position to push for an ambitious but at the same time deliverable and realistic agreement. I pointed to the need to find a satisfactory agreement on a protocol on access and benefit sharing (ABS) and innovative ways of financing. I also highlighted the interconnection between biodiversity, climate change and development. Finally, I stressed the importance of the intergovernmental platform on biodiversity and ecosystems services (IPBES) work and the progress of the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity (TEEB) study.
	Environment Ministers exchanged views on the Commission's proposal on the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the EU. The discussion revealed that there are differing views amongst the member states on the proposal. In particular, several member states questioned how the proposal would work in practice and the compatibility of the proposal with WTO rules. I set out that the UK had yet to finalise its position but welcomed the Commission's proposal as an attempt to find a way through the current impasse on GMO decisions. I underscored that careful reflection was needed of the wider impacts, in particular on the consistency of the proposal with the WTO and the single market as well as the impact on consumer perceptions of food and food security.
	Moving on to climate change business, the council adopted procedural conclusions on the analysis of options to move beyond 20 per cent greenhouse gas emission reductions and assessing the risk of carbon leakage. These take note of the report prepared by the presidency to follow up the Commission communication adopted at the end of May; welcome the ongoing discussions to assess policy options; invite the Commission to conduct further analysis; and indicate that this should also be informed by the roadmap for a low-carbon economy by 2050 currently under preparation by the Commission. The council decided to revert to these issues as soon as possible with a view to the spring 2011 European Council.
	Climate change Ministers agreed the EU's negotiating position to take forward to COP 16 in Cancun at the end of November, adopting conclusions which set out the need to achieve a balanced outcome which paves the way for a global and comprehensive legally binding framework. The main focus of the discussion was the EU's position on agreeing a second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, which will be a key issue for these negotiations. Gregory Barker insisted on the need for the EU to send a clear signal of its willingness to agree a second commitment period provided that other countries enter a parallel legally binding agreement and the environmental integrity of the Kyoto Protocol is addressed.
	Under any other business, Hungary informed the council about its ongoing efforts to contain the environmental damage from the recent red sludge.

Government Departments: Cars

Earl Attlee: My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Transport (Philip Hammond) has made the following Ministerial Statement.
	I am publishing today details of the number of and cost to departments of government cars provided to Ministers by the Government Car and Despatch Agency during the year 1 April 2009 to 31 March 2010.
	The figures are:
	
		
			  No. of Cars at 31.03.10 Total Cost 
			 Cabinet Office 4 £362,790.25 
			 Department for Business, Innovation and Skills 7 £694,236.23 
			 Department for Education (formerly Department for Children, Schools and Families) 6 £489,193.30 
			 Department for Communities and Local Government 6 £488,276.10 
			 Department for Culture, Media and Sport 3 £305,397.32 
			 Department for Energy and Climate Change 4 £303,129.83 
			 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 2 £275,989.34 
			 Department for International Development 3 £256,656.35 
			 Department for Transport 3 £282,979.08 
			 Department for Work and Pensions 6 £506,726.45 
			 Department of Health 6 £475,490.38 
			 Foreign & Commonwealth Office 4 £368,534.31 
			 HM Treasury* 6 £462,989.33 
			 Home Office 6 £514,593.50 
			 Law Officers' Department 2 £188,130.75 
			 Ministry of Defence 1 £106,342.80 
			 Ministry of Justice 4 £320,429.90 
			 Northern Ireland Office 2 £77,850.84 
			 Scotland Office 1 £107,812.75 
			 Wales Office 2 £150,504.20 
			  78 £6,738,053.01 
		
	
	* Note. Figures quoted for HM Treasury do not include direct payments made outside of GCDA.
	Ministers are now encouraged to use public transport where practicable and the number of Ministers entitled to an allocated government car and driver has been kept to a minimum. Other Ministers are entitled to make use of the ministerial car pool service as needed.

Government Departments: Special Advisers

Lord Strathclyde: My right honourable friend the Prime Minister has made the following Statement.
	Listed below are the names of the special advisers in post at 28 October 2010, including each special adviser's pay band, and actual salary where this is £58,200 or higher, together with details of the special advisers pay ranges for 2010-11.
	The estimated pay bill for the period 12 May 2010 to 31 March 2011 remains at £4.9 million.
	The pay bill cost, including severance, for the period l April 2010 to 12 May 2010, totalled £2.1 million, of which £l.8 million was severance.
	In future, this list of special advisers will be updated on a quarterly basis, and published on the No. 10 website.
	For the first time, departments are also publishing today, on their websites, details of gifts and hospitality received by their special advisers during the period 13 May to 31 July.
	This information will be updated and published on departmental websites on a quarterly basis.
	
		
			 Appointing Minister Special Adviser in Post Payband Salary if £58,200 or higher (£), 
			 The Prime Minister Andy Coulson Within scheme ceiling 140,000 
			  Edward Llewellyn Within scheme ceiling 125,000 
			  Kate Fall PB4 100,000 
			  Gabby Bertin PB3 80,000 
			  Tim Chatwin PB3 70,000 
			  Steve Hilton PB3 90,000 
			  Polly Mackenzie1 PB3 80,000 
			  Henry Macrory PB3 70,000 
			  James O'Shaughnessy PB3 87,000 
			  Lena Pietsch1 PB3 80,000 
			  Liz Sugg PB3 80,000 
			  Peter Campbell PB2 60,000 
			  Sean Kemp1 PB2 60,000 
			  Gavin Lockhart PB2  
			  Michael Salter PB2 65,000 
			  Ronan Silva PB2 60,000 
			  Isabel Spearman (p/t) PB2  
			  Sean Worth PB2  
			  Tim Colbourn1 PB1  
			 Deputy Prime Minister Jonny Oates PB4 98,500 
			  Richard Reeves PB3 85,000 
			  Alison Suttie PB3 80,000 
			  Chris Saunders PB2 60,000 
			  James McGrory PB1  
			 First Secretary of State, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Arminka Helic PB3 70,000 
			  Denzil Davidson PB2  
			  Will Littlejohn PB1  
			 Chancellor of the Exchequer2 Ramesh Chhabra PB2 60,000 
			  Poppy Mitchell-Rose PB1  
			 Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice David Hass PB2 69,266 
			  Kathryn Laing PB1  
			 Secretary of State for the Home Department and Minister for Women and Equality Fiona Cunningham PB2 65,000 
			  Nick Timothy PB2 65,000 
			 Secretary of State for Defence Luke Coffey PB2 60,740 
			  Oliver Waghorn PB2 60,740 
			  Hayden Allan PB2  
			 Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills Katie Waring PB1  
			  Giles Wilkes PB1  
			 Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Susie Squire PB2  
			  Philippa Stroud PB2 69,250 
			 Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change Duncan Brack PB2 67,000 
			  Joel Kenrick PB2  
			 Secretary of State for Health Bill Morgan PB3 76,000 
			  Jenny Parsons PB2  
			 Secretary of State for Education Henry de Zoete PB2  
			  Elena Narozanski PB1  
			 Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Giles Kenningham PB2 64,000 
			  Sheridan Westlake PB2 64,500 
			 Secretary of State for Transport Sian Jones PB2  
			  Paul Stephenson PB2  
			 Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Simon Cawte PB2  
			 Secretary of State for International Development Philippa Buckley PB1  
			  Richard Parr PB1  
			 Secretary of State for Northern Ireland Jonathan Caine PB2 69,266 
			 Secretary of State for Scotland Euan Roddin PB2 60,000 
			 Secretary of State for Wales Richard Hazlewood PB1  
			 Secretary of State for Culture, Media, the Olympics and Sport Adam Smith PB2  
			  Sue Beeby PB1  
			 Chief Secretary Will de Peyer PB2 63,000 
			  Julia Goldsworthy3 PB3 74,000 
			 Minister without Portfolio Naweed Khan PB0  
			 Leader of the House of Lords, and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Flo Coleman PB0  
			  Elizabeth Hanna PB0  
			 Minister for the Cabinet Office, Paymaster General Laura Trott PB2  
			 Minister of State, Cabinet Office Martha Varney PB1  
			 Minister of State (Universities and Science), BIS Nick Hillman PB2  
			 Leader of the House of Commons and Lord Privy Seal Robert Riddell PB2  
			 Chief Whip (Commons) Chris White PB2  
			  Ben Williams PB2 68,000 
		
	
	1 Appointed by the Deputy Prime Minister and based in No. 10
	2 In addition, the Chancellor of the Exchequer has appointed Rupert Harrison (PB3, £80,300), and Eleanor Shawcross (PB2) to the Council of Economic Advisers.
	3 Julia Goldsworthy will not receive her salary as a special adviser until November 2010, as she was in receipt of a resettlement grant when she lost her parliamentary seat at the general election in May
	Special Adviser Pay Bands for 2010-11
	The pay bands and pay ranges for special advisers for 2010-11 are as follows:
	
		
			 Scheme Ceiling £142,668 
			 Pay Band 4 £88,966-£106,864 
			 Pay Band 3 and Premium £66,512-£103,263 
			 Pay Band 2 £52,215-£69,266 
			 Pay Band 1 £40,352-£54,121 
			 Pay Band 0 Up to £40,352

Government: Official Hospitality

Lord Strathclyde: My right honourable friend the Prime Minister has made the following Statement.
	The Government are today publishing details of ministerial overseas travel; hospitality received; gifts given and received over £140; and official meetings with external organisations during the period 13 May- 31 July 2010. This information is being published on departmental websites and will be updated and published on a quarterly basis on departmental websites.
	I am also placing in the Libraries of the House: details of former Ministers' overseas travel costing over £500 during 2009-10; details of gifts given and received by former Ministers over £140 during 2009-10; and, the annual list of those who received official hospitality at Chequers during 2009-10.

Insolvency Service

Baroness Wilcox: My honourable friend the Minister for Employment Relations, Consumers and Postal Affairs (Edward Davey) has today made the following Statement.
	I am setting out today this Government's response to the consultation on reforming debtor petition bankruptcy and early discharge, which closed in February 2010.
	In total 37 businesses, individuals, and representative bodies responded to the consultation, with the majority indicating broad support for the proposals. Copies of the non-confidential responses to the consultation are now available on the Insolvency Service website at www.insolvency.gov.uk together with a summary of those responses.
	It is clear from the responses that interested parties see benefits in removing the court from the process in circumstances where it is unnecessary for a court to take a decision. The Insolvency Service will be exploring with Ministry of Justice and HM Courts Services how best to realise those benefits to produce a bankruptcy system that is suitably accessible and affordable, as well as providing an efficient service for all those who need to use it. I expect that this work will result in enhanced and detailed proposals being published in due course.
	There was also support for repeal of early discharge. This requires primary legislation, and will therefore be brought forward when parliamentary time allows.
	Copies of the analysis of the consultation are being placed in the Libraries.

Mental Capacity Act 2005

Lord McNally: My right honourable friend the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice (Kenneth Clarke) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	I am today laying before Parliament the Government's Memorandum to the Justice Select Committee on post-legislative scrutiny of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
	The primary purpose of the Act was to empower and protect people who may lack capacity to make decisions for themselves and to enable people to be able to make provision for a time in the future when they may lack capacity. Implementation of the Act has ensured that these measures are in place.

School Support Staff Negotiating Body

Lord Hill of Oareford: My honourable friend the Secretary of State for Education (Michael Gove) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	The SSSNB was established by the previous Government to develop a national pay and conditions framework for school support staff working in maintained schools in England. The Government have conducted a review of the future policy direction for determining school support staff pay and conditions, including the role of the SSSNB, and has concluded that the SSSNB does not fit well with the Government's priorities for greater deregulation of the pay and conditions arrangements for the school workforce. I therefore propose to introduce legislation to abolish the SSSNB at the earliest opportunity.
	This decision means that school support staff will continue to have their pay and conditions determined in accordance with existing arrangements whereby decisions are taken at a local level by employers.
	In reaching this decision the Government have considered very carefully the views of the SSSNB trade union and employer member organisations, and the SSSNB independent chair. I will be writing today to the independent chair and lead representatives of the SSSNB member organisations to notify them of the Government's decision.

Scientific Research

Baroness Wilcox: My right honourable friend the Minister of Universities and Science (David Willetts) has today made the following Statement.
	The Haldane principle is an important cornerstone for the protection of the scientific independence and excellence. We all benefit from its application in the UK.
	The principle that decisions on individual research proposals are best taken by researchers through peer review is strongly supported by the coalition Government. Prioritisation of an individual research council's spending within its allocation is not a decision for Ministers. Such decisions are rightly left to those best placed to evaluate the scientific quality, excellence and likely impact of scientific programmes.
	The Government do, however, need to take a view on the overall level of funding to science and research and they have decided to protect and to ring-fence the science and research budget for the next four years. This decision has been made in the context of the current economic status of the UK and the strategic importance of research funding, while recognising the value of science to our future growth, prosperity and cultural heritage.
	Over the years there has been some uncertainty over the interpretation of the Haldane principle. I intend to clarify this as a statement which will be released alongside the science and research budget allocations towards the end of this year. In order that this Statement has the consent of the research community, I intend to consult with senior figures in the UK science and research community to develop a robust statement of the Haldane principle.

Transport: Local Authority Schemes

Earl Attlee: My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Transport (Philip Hammond) has made the following Ministerial Statement.
	I refer to the points of order made in the House on Tuesday 26 October expressing concern that an advance copy of my Statement on investment in highway and local transport schemes had been made available to the honourable Member for Cheltenham. In response to those points of order, I stated that I had no knowledge of any advance copy of the Statement being made available to him.
	I have since been informed that an advance copy of the Statement was sent by my office to the honourable Member for Cheltenham at the same time as a copy was sent to the official Opposition spokesman. I was not aware of this at the time and I would like to apologise for inadvertently misleading the House.